عنوان مقاله [English]
Scarcity of water resources in the entire country is more serious in the northern provinces like Golestan. Therefore, farmers have to use saline water or waste waters. One way to adapt to this condition is to use unconventional water such as Caspian Sea water, with lower salinity as compared with water from free seas, for common crops like soybean. Thus feasibility of using Caspian Sea water that has integrated with narrow common water and the calibration of Aquacrop model under the effect of salinity and water stress for soybean crop in Golestan province are more important. The Aquacrop model assumes a linear relationship between the biomass yield (BY) and crop transpiration one one hand and water productivity (WP) value on the other (Steduto and Albrizio, 2005). This model, as compared to other crop models, requires minimal input data and its new version 4.0 (June, 2012) has a salinity module which was used in this research to simulate the grain yield (GY) and WP of soybean under deficit and saline water irrigation. Furthermore, the AquaCrop model has not often been tested to simulate the yield of soybean under saline conditions in the semi-arid climate of Golestan province. This study aims at evaluating the efficiency of AquaCrop model in soybean yield simulation. The results are to be used for optimizing water consumption under water and saline stress. To this end, an experiment was carried out at the research farm of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.
1- Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T.B.S., Man Singh, P. and Ahmad, T., 2010. Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 110, PP.55–66.
2- Babazadeh, H. And Sarai Tabrizi, M., 2012. Assessment of AquaCrop Model Under soybean deficit irrigation management conditions. Journal of Water and Soil, 26(2), PP.329-339. (In Persian).
3- Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and Drainage paper no. 33. FAO, Rome.
4- Farahani, H.J., Izzi, G. and Oweis, T.Y., 2009. Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), pp.469-476.
5- Kanian, H., Nazari, B., Beiginezhad, M., Rahimi. and Eghbali, H., 2012. Evaluation of AquaCrop model in dificit irigation management of wheat in the Torogh of Mashhad. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2(5), pp.216-226. (In Persian).
6- Mahmum, S., 2013. Evaluation and calibration of AquaCrop model under various diets of water and nitrogen fertilizers in cotton cultivation in Golestan climate, M.S Thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.90p. (In Persian).
7- Patel, N., Kumar, P. and Sign, N., 2008. Performance evaluation of AquaCrop in simulating Potato yield under varying water availability condition. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India.
8- Rostami Hir, M.,Galeshi, S., Soltani, A. and Zeinali, E., 2004. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybean cultivars (Gycine max L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources of Gorgan, 11(2), PP.127-136. (In Persian).
9- Sharafi, A., 2014. Determinetion of the water use efficiency and yield of soybean Under different level of water and salinity stress and evaluation of AquaCrop model, M.S Thesis, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.85p. (In Persian).