Irrigation Sciences and Engineering

Irrigation Sciences and Engineering

Classification and modeling based on soft Computing of Karun River: Gatund and Ahvaz Hydrometric Stations

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Master in Civil Engineering, Department of Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran..
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Hydraulic Structures, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Abstract
Investigating changes in the quality of surface water has always been one of the most important issues for drinking, agriculture and industry, In this research, the water quality of the Karun River which is one of the largest sources of surface water supply in different parts of Khuzestan province, was studied at the Gatund water measuring station located downstream of the Gatund dam and Ahvaz water measuring station. The results indicate that during the years 2008 to 2011 and 2013 to 2015, which experienced lower than average precipitation, reflecting drought conditions, the reduction in river discharge has led to an increase in TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) and EC (Electrical Conductivity) values. According to the Piper diagram, the overall status of water samples taken at the Gotvand station shows a tendency towards non-carbonate hardness after the operation of the Gotvand dam in 2011. The water samples at this station exhibit anionic characteristics in the chloride zone or a mixed zone, and in terms of cations, they are positioned in the sodium-potassium or mixed zone. The Schoeller diagram results demonstrate that the water quality of the Karun River in terms of drinking water standards is acceptable at this station Also, the difference of water quality parameters of Karun River in dry (April to September) and wet (October to March) periods is 20% in Gatund station and 10% in Ahvaz station. The results obtained from the regression analysis of the TDS parameter in the Ahvaz hydrometric station show that machine learning models can be used as a powerful tool in predicting surface water quality , so that the performance of the decision tree model with the coefficient The determination of R2=0.97 and the multivariate regression model with the coefficient of determination R2=0.95 was used in the prediction of this parameter.
Keywords
Subjects

  • Aazami, J., Moradpour, H., Zamani, A., & Kianimehr, N. 2018. Ecological quality assessment of Kor River in Fars Province using macroinvertebrates indices. International Journal of Environmental Science Technology, 17(4), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2107-y

 

  • An, R., Liu, J., Gao, Z., Li, C., & Peng, Y. 2024. Hydrochemical Characterization, Controlling Factors and Water Quality of Surface Water in Shandong Province, North China. Journal of Earth Science, 35(1), 155–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1441-z

 

  • Allahverdipour, P., & Sattari, M.T. 2023. Comparing the performance of the multiple linear regression classic method and modern data mining methods in annual rainfall modeling (Case study: Ahvaz city). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 3(2), 125-142. DOI: 10.22098/mmws.2022.11337.1120

 

  • Anuja, S. A., Kavitha, P., Hency, P. M., Jothi, C. H., & Rose, R. J. 2023. Comparative study of water quality between upstream and downstream of Thamirabarani River using multivariate statistical tools. Scientific Research and Essays 18(3), pp. 33–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE2023.6774

 

  • Ashrafi, S. M., & Mahmoudi, M. 2019. Developing a semi-distributed decision support system for great Karun water resources system. Journal of Applied Research in Water and Wastewater, 6(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.22126/arww.2019.1042

 

  • Astel, A., Biziuk, M., Przyjazny, A. & Namiesnik, J. 2006. Chemometrics in monitoring spatial and temporal variations in drinking water quality. Water Research, 8, 1706-1716.

 

  • 2013. Schlumberger Limited. Available at http://www.swstechnology.com. Accessed 09/07/2013.

 

  • Babolhakami, A., & GholamiSefidkouhi, M. 2019. Analyze of Talar River Water Quality using Multivariate Techniques. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 9 (18) ,250-259. Doi: 29252/jwmr.9.18.250

 

  • Basu, S., & Lokesh, K. S. 2014. Application of multiple linear regression and manova to evaluate health impacts due to changing river water quality. Applied Mathematics, 2014. https://www.scirp.org/html/2-7401995_44066.htm

 

  • Cheraghi, Z., Sarikhani, R., Farahpour, M., & Ghasemi, A. 2019. Evaluation and Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Quality Parameters and Index for Drinking in Khorramabad Region. Water Resources Engineering, 11(39), 1-14.

 

  • Das, A. 2023. Anthropogenic Effects on Surface Water Quality Assessment in Baitarani River Basin, Odisha Using GIS and MCDM Techniques. Engineering Research Transcripts, 5, 37–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55084/grinrey/ERT/978-81-964105-3-7_4

 

  • Diaz, R., Olan, M., & Valente, R. 2004. Review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. Journal of Environmental Management 73: 165-181.

 

  • Ewaid, S. H., Abed, S. A., & Kadhum, S. A. 2018. Predicting the Tigris River water quality within Baghdad, Iraq by using water quality index and regression analysis. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 11, 390–398.

 

  • Fan, X., Cui, B., Zhao, H., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, H. 2010. Assessment of river water quality in Pearl River Delta using multivariate statistical techniques. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, 1220–1234.

 

  • Fierro, P., Valdovinos, C., Vargas-Chacoff, L., Bertrán, C., & Arismendi, I. 2017. Macroinvertebrates and Fishes as Bioindicators of Stream Water Pollution. InTech, 23-38, DOI: 5772/65084

 

  • GhassemiDehnavi, A., Sarikhani R., Hosseini H., Ahmadnejad Z. & Ebrahimi B. 2016. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of surface water using statistical analysis in Azna River, Lorestan. Environ. Water Eng., 2(4), 306 –321.

 

  • Gholizadeh, M., & Zibaei, M. 2020. Hydrochemical assessment of Chehelchai river water, Golestan province for drinking and agricultural purposes. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment., 13 (2), 283-298. (In Persian).

 

  • Haghiabi, A. H., Nasrolahi, A. H., & Parsaie, A. 2018. Water quality prediction using machine learning methods. Water Quality Research Journal, 53(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2018.025

 

  • Jolliffe, I.T., & Cadima, J. 2016. Principal component analysis: A review and recent
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202

 

  • Kadam, A. K., Wagh, V. M., Muley, A. A., Umrikar, B. N., & Sankhua, R. N. 2019. Prediction of water quality index using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression modelling approach in Shivganga River basin, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5(3), 951–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00581-3

 

  • Kamal Jyoti Maji & Ramjee Chaudhary. 2019. Principal Component Analysis for Water Quality Assessment of the Ganga River in Uttar Pradesh, India. Water Resources, 46(5), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807819050129

 

  • Kazemzadeh, M., & Malekian, A. 2016. Analysis of surface water quality parameters using multivariate statistical methods. Pasture and watershed scientific-research journal, 70(2), 465-478. [In Persian]

 

  • Kheradmand, M., Moghaddam, M. A., Zahiri, A., & Ghorbani, K. 2023. Determining of stage-discharge relationship for meandering compound channels using M5 decision tree model. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 17(7), 284-288.

 

  • Kord, M. 2020. Development of Hydrogeochem software for investigation of hydrogeochemical properties and water quality. Hydrogeology, 5(2), 88-98. (In Persian)

 

  • Liu, J., Gao, Z., Feng, J., & Wang, M. 2023. Identification of the hydrochemical features, genesis, water quality and potential health hazards of groundwater in Dawen River Basin, North China. Ecological Indicators, 149, 110175.

 

  • Mahmoodlu, M., & Sayadi, M. 2020. Determining effective factors controlling chemical parameters of Gamasyab and Ghareh-Sou Rivers (Case study: Kermanshah Province). Irrigation and Water Engineering, 10(4), 96-114. doi: 10.22125/iwe.2020.110071

 

  • Malekian, A., Rozandi, Y., KhaileghiSigaroudi, S., & Farrokhzadeh, B. 2016. Examining temporal and spatial changes of underground water quality using the combined approach of Boolean logic, fuzzy logic and geostatistics (case study: Varamin plain). Agricultural Applied Research, 29(1), 126-135. [In Persian]

 

  • Mansour-Bahmani, A., Haghiabi, A. H., Shamsi, Z., & Parsaie, A. 2021. Predictive modeling the discharge of urban wastewater using artificial intelligent models (case study: Kerman city). Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7(3), 1917–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00900-z

 

  • Mohammadi, H., Kalantari, N., Anbari, A., & Pahlevanizade, S. 2021. Hydrochemical assessment of the Jareh Dam water resources; using multivariate statistical techniques and hydrochemical methods. Advanced Applied Geology, 10(4), 620-633. Doi: 22055/aag.2020.29692.1993

 

  • Motiee, H., McBean, E., Motiee, A. R., & Majdzadeh Tabatabaei, M. R. 2020. Assessment of climate change under CMIP5-RCP scenarios on downstream rivers glaciers – Sardabrud River of Alam-Kuh glacier, International Journal of River Basin Management, 18(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2019.1653311

 

  • Najafzadeh, M. and Mahmoudi-Rad, M., 2015. Estimation of the Maximum Scour Depth at Bridge Pier under Effects of Debris Accumulations using NF-GMDH Model and Evolutionary Algorithms. Environment and Water Engineering, 5(3), pp.213-225.

 

  • Nasir, M. F. M., Samsudin, M. S., Mohamad, I., Awaluddin, M. R. A., Mansor, M. A., Juahir, H., & Ramli, N. 2011. River water quality modeling using combined principle component analysis (PCA) and multiple linear regressions (MLR): A case study at Klang River, Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14, 73–82.

 

  • Nezaratian, H., Zahiri, J., Peykani, M. F., Haghiabi, A., & Parsaie, A. 2021. A genetic algorithm-based support vector machine to estimate the transverse mixing coefficient in streams. Water Quality Research Journal, 56(3), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2021.003

 

  • Nolan, B.T., Fienen, M.N., & Lorenz, D.L. 2015. A statistical learning framework for groundwater nitrate models of the Central Valley, California, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 531, 902-911

 

  • Nurollahi, S., AsghariMoghadam, A., Fijani, E., & Barzegar, R. 2018. Investigating the factors affecting the quality of underground water in Mashginshahr plain (Ardebil province) with an emphasis on the possible origin of some heavy metals. Scientific Quarterly of Earth Sciences, 29(114), 143-152. [In Persian]

 

  • Ouma, Y. O., Okuku, C. O., & Njau, E. N. 2020. Use of artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression model for the prediction of dissolved oxygen in rivers: Case study of hydrographic basin of River Nyando, Kenya. Complexity, 2020, 1–23.

 

  • Ouyang, Y. 2005. Evaluation of river water quality monitoring stations by principal component analysis. Water Research, 39(12), 2621–2635.

 

  • Palaniselvan, G., Govindhan, P., Jayganesh, D., Kumar, M. D., & Chandraseelan, R. E. 2024. Water quality assessment: A case study in the Tuticorin district of Tamil Nadu in South India. Urban Water Journal, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2024.2312525

 

  • Parsaie, A., & Haghiabi, A. H. 2017. Computational Modeling of Pollution Transmission in Rivers. Applied Water Science, 7(3), 1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0319-6.

 

  • Petersen, W., Bertino, L., Callies, U., & Zorita, E. 2001. Process identification by principal component analysis of river water-quality data. Ecological Modelling, 138(1–3), 193–213.

 

  • Pinto, R., Patrício, J., Baeta, A., Fath, B. D., Neto, J. M., & Marques, J. C. 2009. Review and evaluation of estuarine biotic indices to assess benthic condition. Ecological indicators, 9(1), 1-25.

 

  • Rooki, R., Ariafar, A., & AdeliNasab, J. 2017. Investigating the quality of underground water in the Gonabad plain of Khorasan Razavi aquifer using multivariate statistical methods. Journal of Mineral Resources Engineering, 2(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmre.2017.1068

 

 

  • Quinlan, J.R., 1992, November. Learning with continuous classes. In 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence(Vol. 92, pp. 343-348).

 

  • Wang, Y. and Witten, I.H., 1996. Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes.

 

  • Zare Abyaneh, H. 2014. Evaluation of multivariate linear regression and artificial neural networks in prediction of water quality parameters. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 12(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-40

 

  • Zhang H, Li H, Yu H, Cheng S 2020 Water quality assessment and pollution source apportionment using multi-statistic and APCSMLR modeling techniques in Min River Basin, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:1–14. https:// org/10.1007/s11356-020-10219-
Volume 48, Issue 3
Autumn 2025
Pages 125-145

  • Receive Date 20 January 2024
  • Revise Date 29 February 2024
  • Accept Date 03 March 2024
  • Publish Date 23 October 2025