1- Abbasi, M. and El Hanandeh, A., 2016. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches.
Waste Management, 56, pp.13-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.018.
2- Abiodun, O.I., Jantan, A., Omolara, A.E., Dada, K.V., Mohamed, N.A. and Arshad, H., 2018. State-of-the-art in artificial neural network applications: a survey. Heliyon 4: e00938. ISSN: 2405–8440 [online]. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018. e00938 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00938.
3- Agarwal, S., Sharma, S., Rahman, M.H., Vranckx, S., Maiheu, B., Blyth, L., Janssen, S., Gargava, P., Shukla, V.K. and Batra, S., 2020. Air quality forecasting using artificial neural networks with real time dynamic error correction in highly polluted regions. Science of the Total Environment, 735, p.139454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139454.
4- Agarwal, S., Tyagi, I., Gupta, V.K., Ghaedi, M., Masoomzade, M., Ghaedi, A.M. and Mirtamizdoust, B., 2016. RETRACTED: kinetics and thermodynamics of methyl orange adsorption from aqueous solutions—artificial
Neural Network-particle Swarm Optimization Modeling.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.02.048.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.02.048
5- Alizadeh, M.J., Kavianpour, M.R., Danesh, M., Adolf, J., Shamshirband, S. and Chau, K.W., 2018. Effect of river flow on the quality of estuarine and coastal waters using machine learning models. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12(1), pp.810-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2018.1528480.
6- Arnon, T.A., Ezra, S. and Fishbain, B., 2019. Water characterization and early contamination detection in highly varying stochastic background water, based on Machine Learning methodology for processing real-time UV-Spectrophotometry. Water Research, 155, pp.333-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.027.
7- Asadi, A., Verma, A., Yang, K. and Mejabi, B., 2017. Wastewater treatment aeration process optimization: A data mining approach.
Journal of Environmental Management,
203, pp.630-639.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.047https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.047.
8- Bagheri, M., Bazvand, A. and Ehteshami, M., 2017. Application of artificial intelligence for the management of landfill leachate penetration into groundwater, and assessment of its environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, pp.784-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.011
9- Bahrami, S., Niaei, A., Illán-Gómez, M.J., Tarjomannejad, A., Mousavi, S.M. and Albaladejo-Fuentes, V., 2017. Catalytic reduction of NO by CO over CeO2-MOx (0.25)(M= Mn, Fe and Cu) mixed oxides—Modeling and optimization of catalyst preparation by hybrid ANN-GA. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(5), pp.4937-4947.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.09.023. (In Persian)
10- Barzegar, R., Moghaddam, A.A., Deo, R., Fijani, E. and Tziritis, E., 2018. Mapping groundwater contamination risk of multiple aquifers using multi-model ensemble of machine learning algorithms.
Science of the Total Environment,
621, pp.697-712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.185https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.185.
11- Bhuvaneshwari, K.S., Uma, J., Venkatachalam, K., Masud, M., Abouhawwash, M. and Logeswaran, T., 2022. Gaussian Support Vector Machine Algorithm Based Air Pollution Prediction. Computers, Materials & Continua, 71(1). DOI:10.32604/cmc.2022.021477.
12- Bibri, S. E., Huang, J., Jagatheesaperumal, S. K., & Krogstie, J. (2024). The synergistic interplay of artificial intelligence and digital twin in environmentally planning sustainable smart cities: A comprehensive systematic review.
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 100433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100433.
13- Chan, C.W. and Huang, G.H., 2003. Artificial intelligence for management and control of pollution minimization and mitigation processes. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(2), pp.75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(03)00062-9.
14- Chang, F.J., Chung, C.H., Chen, P.A., Liu, C.W., Coynel, A. and Vachaud, G., 2014. Assessment of arsenic concentration in stream water using neuro fuzzy networks with factor analysis.
Science of the Total Environment,
494, pp.202-210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.133.
15- Chen, W., Xie, X., Wang, J., Pradhan, B., Hong, H., Bui, D.T., Duan, Z. and Ma, J., 2017. A comparative study of logistic model tree, random forest, and classification and regression tree models for spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility. Catena, 151, pp.147-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032
16- Cohen, A.J., Brauer, M., Burnett, R., Anderson, H.R., Frostad, J., Estep, K., Balakrishnan, K., Brunekreef, B., Dandona, L., Dandona, R. and Feigin, V., 2017. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. The lancet, 389(10082), pp.1907-1918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(17)30505-6.
17- Dieguez-Santana, K., Pham-The, H., Villegas-Aguilar, P.J., Le-Thi-Thu, H., Castillo-Garit, J.A. and Casañola-Martin, G.M., 2019. Prediction of acute toxicity of phenol derivatives using multiple linear regression approach for Tetrahymena pyriformis contaminant identification in a median-size database.
Chemosphere,
165,pp.434-441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.041https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.041.
18- Elhedhli, S. and Merrick, R., 2012. Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(5), pp.370-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.02.002.
19- Erkinay Ozdemir, M., Ali, Z., Subeshan, B. and Asmatulu, E., 2021. Applying machine learning approach in recycling. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 23, pp.855-871. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01182-y.
20- Fan, M., Hu, J., Cao, R., Ruan, W. and Wei, X., 2018. A review on experimental design for pollutants removal in water treatment with the aid of artificial intelligence. Chemosphere, 200, pp.330-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.111.
21- Fan, M., Hu, J., Cao, R., Xiong, K. and Wei, X., 2017. Modeling and prediction of copper removal from aqueous solutions by nZVI/rGO magnetic nanocomposites using ANN-GA and ANN-PSO. Scientific reports, 7(1), p.18040. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18223-y.
22- Ferreira, A.R.L., Fernandes, L.S., Cortes, R.M.V. and Pacheco, F.A.L., 2017. Assessing anthropogenic impacts on riverine ecosystems using nested partial least squares regression. Science of the Total Environment, 583, pp.466-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.106.
23- Genuino, D.A.D., Bataller, B.G., Capareda, S.C. and De Luna, M.D.G., 2017. Application of artificial neural network in the modeling and optimization of humic acid extraction from municipal solid waste biochar.
Journal of environmental chemical engineering,
5(4), pp.4101-4107.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.071https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.071.
24- Gu, F., Zhang, W., Guo, J. and Hall, P., 2019. Exploring “Internet+ Recycling”: Mass balance and life cycle assessment of a waste management system associated with a mobile application.
Science of the Total Environment,
649, pp.172-185.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.298.
25- He, J., Gong, S., Yu, Y., Yu, L., Wu, L., Mao, H., Song, C., Zhao, S., Liu, H., Li, X. and Li, R., 2017. Air pollution characteristics and their relation to meteorological conditions during 2014–2015 in major Chinese cities.
Environmental pollution,
223, pp.484-496.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.050https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.01.050.
26- Hoseinian, F.S., Rezai, B. and Kowsari, E., 2017. The nickel ion removal prediction model from aqueous solutions using a hybrid neural genetic algorithm. Journal of environmental management, 204, pp.311-317. https:doi.org/10,1016/j.jenvman.2016,09,011https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.011. (In Persian)
27- Hua, D., Gao, J., Mayo, R., Smedley, A., Puranik, P. and Zhan, J., 2020, January. Segregating hazardous waste using deep neural networks in real-time video. In 2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 1016-1022). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/CCWC47524.2020.9031194.
28- Huang, J. and Koroteev, D.D., 2021. Artificial intelligence for planning of energy and waste management. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, p.101426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101426.
29- Huang, Y.W. and Chen, M.Q., 2015. Artificial neural network modeling of thin layer drying behavior of municipal sewage sludge. Measurement, 73, pp.640-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.014.
30- Jahani, A & Siri, H. (2021). The effect of urban vegetation on reducing noise pollution using artificial neural networks. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 27(8), 164-179. Doi: 10.22080/usfs.2021.18687.1978. (In Persian)
31- Jaramillo, F., Orchard, M., Muñoz, C., Antileo, C., Sáez, D. and Espinoza, P., 2018. On-line estimation of the aerobic phase length for partial nitrification processes in SBR based on features extraction and SVM classification.
Chemical Engineering Journal,
331, pp.114-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.185 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.185.
32- Jian, H., Xu, M. and Zhou, L., 2019. Collaborative collection effort strategies based on the “Internet+ recycling” business model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, p.118120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118120.
33- Kalogirou, S.A., 2003. Artificial intelligence for the modeling and control of combustion processes: a review.
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science,
29(6), pp.515-566.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(03)00058-3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-1285(03)00058-3
34- Kannangara, M., Dua, R., Ahmadi, L. and Bensebaa, F., 2018. Modeling and prediction of regional municipal solid waste generation and diversion in Canada using machine learning approaches.
Waste Management,
74, pp.3-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105381.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.057
35- Karatzas, K.D. and Kaltsatos, S., 2007. Air pollution modelling with the aid of computational intelligence methods in Thessaloniki, Greece. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(10), pp.1310-1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.09.005.
36- Kashiwao, T., Nakayama, K., Ando, S., Ikeda, K., Lee, M. and Bahadori, A., 2017. A neural network-based local rainfall prediction system using meteorological data on the Internet: A case study using data from the Japan Meteorological Agency.
Applied Soft Computing,
56, pp.317-330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.015.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.03.015
37- Kasprzyk, J.R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P.M. and Lempert, R.J., 2013. Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 42, pp.55-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007.
38- Khosravi, K., Panahi, M. and Tien Bui, D., 2018. Spatial prediction of groundwater spring potential mapping based on an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and metaheuristic optimization. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(9), pp.4771-4792. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4771-2018.
39- Kubat, M., Holte, R.C. and Matwin, S., 1998. Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Machine Learning, 30, pp.195-215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007452223027.
40- Labadie, J.W., 2013. Advances in water resources systems engineering: applications of machine learning. In Modern Water Resources Engineering (pp. 467-523). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_10.
41- Li, W. and Yi, P., 2020. Assessment of city sustainability—Coupling coordinated development among economy, society and environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, p.120453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453.
42- Li, Y., Dong, H. and Lu, S., 2021. Research on application of a hybrid heuristic algorithm in transportation carbon emission. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), pp.48610-48627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14079-y.
43- Liao, B. and Wang, T., 2020. Research on industrial waste recovery network optimization: opportunities brought by artificial intelligence.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering,
2020(1), p.3618424.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3618424.
44- Liu, H., Wu, H., Lv, X., Ren, Z., Liu, M., Li, Y. and Shi, H., 2019. An intelligent hybrid model for air pollutant concentrations forecasting: Case of Beijing in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, p.101471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101471.
45- Mahmoudzadeh, H., Samadi, M & Paydar, M. (2023). Application of artificial neural network and linear regression in assessing air pollution in Tabriz metropolis.
Geography and Planning, 27(86), 167-184.
10.22034/gp.2022.51620.3003 (In Persian)
46- Nandagopal, M.G., Abraham, E. and Selvaraju, N., 2017. Advanced neural network prediction and system identification of liquid-liquid flow patterns in circular microchannels with varying angle of confluence. Chemical Engineering Journal, 309, pp.850-865. https://doi.org/10.3390/
environments8110116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.106.
47- Nations, U. N. I. E. S. (2018). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
48- Nowakowski, P., Szwarc, K. and Boryczka, U., 2020. Combining an artificial intelligence algorithm and a novel vehicle for sustainable e-waste collection. Science of the Total Environment, 730, p.138726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138726.
49- Oliveira, V., Sousa, V. and Dias-Ferreira, C., 2019. Artificial neural network modelling of the amount of separately-collected household packaging waste.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
210, pp.401-409.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.063.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.063
50- Olsson, G., 2012. ICA and me–a subjective review. Water Research, 46(6), pp.1585-1624. Doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.054https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.054.
51- Pai, P.F., Lin, K.P., Lin, C.S. and Chang, P.T., 2010. Time series forecasting by a seasonal support vector regression model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), pp.4261-4265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.076.
52- Pannakkong, W., Pham, V.H. and Huynh, V.N., 2017. A novel hybridization of ARIMA, ANN, and K-Means for time series forecasting. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), 8(4), pp.30-53. DOI: 10.4018/IJKSS.2017100103.
53- Prince, H.M., Ara, I., Shafri, H.Z.M., Hamedianfar, A., Mansor, S., Idrees, M.O., Shaharum, N.S.N. and Iqbal, M., 2022. Application of Cloud-Based Machine Learning Approach to Analyse Remotely Sensed Data for Coastal Monitoring in Bangladesh. In Artificial Intelligence and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges and Solutions in the Era of Industry 4.0 (pp. 171-191). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1434-8_9.
54- Qaidi, A.M., Vafaei, A. (2016). Applications of artificial neural networks for absorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 245, 20–39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.015. https://doi.org/10,1016/j.cis.2016,04,015.(In Persian)
55- Ramona, M., Richard, G. and David, B., 2012. Multiclass feature selection with kernel gram-matrix-based criteria. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23(10), pp.1611-1623. DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2012.2201748.
56- Rentsch, R., Heinzel, C. and Brinksmeier, E., 2015. Artificial intelligence for an energy and resource efficient manufacturing chain design and operation.
Procedia CIRP,
33, pp.139-144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.026.
57- Da Rocha, S.J.S.S., Torres, C.M.M.E., Jacovine, L.A.G., Leite, H.G., Gelcer, E.M., Neves, K.M., Schettini, B.L.S., Villanova, P.H., da Silva, L.F., Reis, L.P. and Zanuncio, J.C., 2018. Artificial neural networks: Modeling tree survival and mortality in the Atlantic Forest biome in Brazil.
Science of the Total Environment,
645, pp.655-661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.123https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.123.
58- Saini, J., Dutta, M. and Marques, G., 2020. Indoor air quality prediction systems for smart environments: A systematic review. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 12(5), pp.433-453. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-200574.
59- Salimbahrami, S.R. and Shakeri, R., 2021. Experimental investigation and comparative machine-learning prediction of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete. Soft Computing, 25(2), pp.919-932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05571-1.
60- Schürholz, D., Kubler, S. and Zaslavsky, A., 2020. Artificial intelligence-enabled context-aware air quality prediction for smart cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, p.121941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121941.
61- Shams, S.R., Jahani, A., Kalantary, S., Moeinaddini, M. and Khorasani, N., 2021. Artificial intelligence accuracy assessment in NO2 concentration forecasting of metropolises air. Scientific Reports, 11(1), p.1805. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81455-6.
62- Strobl, R.O. and Robillard, P.D., 2006. Artificial intelligence technologies in surface water quality monitoring. Water International, 31(2), pp.198-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2006.9709670.
63- Suárez-Escobar, A., Pataquiva-Mateus, A. and López-Vasquez, A., 2016. Electrocoagulation—photocatalytic process for the treatment of lithographic wastewater. Optimization using response surface methodology (RSM) and kinetic study. Catalysis Today, 266, pp.120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.09.016.
64- Tanhaei, B., Ayati, A., Lahtinen, M., Mahmoodzadeh Vaziri, B. and Sillanpää, M., 2016. A magnetic mesoporous chitosan based core‐shells biopolymer for anionic dye adsorption: Kinetic and isothermal study and application of ANN. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 133(22). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43466.
65- Tatar, A., Naseri, S., Bahadori, M., Hezave, A.Z., Kashiwao, T., Bahadori, A. and Darvish, H., 2016. Prediction of carbon dioxide solubility in ionic liquids using MLP and radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 60, pp.151-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2015.11.002.
66- Topouzelis, K., 2003. A neural network approach to oil spill detection using SAR data. In 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law (pp. B-6). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.IAC-03-B.6.06.
67- United Nations, 2018. The world’s cities in 2018 data booklet, economics & social affairs. https://www.un.org/en/events/citiesday/assets/pdf/the_worlds_cities_ in_2018_data_booklet.pdf. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/chinesest2018.02.013 (Accessed 13 April 2020).
68- Vapnik, V., 2013. The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer science & business media.doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1.
69- Vosough, K., Asaadi, S., Alinejad, H., & Kahforoshan, D. (2023). Assessment and prediction of volatile organic compound pollution levels at refueling stations using a neural network model. Journal of Farayandno, 18(81), pp.31-45. Doi: 10.22034/farayandno.2023.1988180.1911 (In Persian)
70- Wang, J., Chitsaz, F., Derbyshire, M.K., Gonzales, N.R., Gwadz, M., Lu, S., Marchler, G.H., Song, J.S., Thanki, N., Yamashita, R.A. and Yang, M., 2023. The conserved domain database in 2023. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(D1), pp.D384-D388. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1096.
71- Wang, B. and Li, H., 2020. Multi-objective optimization model of waste tire recycling network. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 214, p. 03052). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021403052.
72- Wang, B., Hong, G., Qin, T., Fan, W.R. and Yuan, X.C., 2019. Factors governing the willingness to pay for air pollution treatment: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, pp.1304-1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.046.
73- Wang, C., Ye, Z., Yu, Y. and Gong, W., 2018. Estimation of bus emission models for different fuel types of buses under real conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 640, pp.965-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.289.
74- Yu, K.H., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Montenegro-Marin, C.E. and Kumar, P.M., 2021. Environmental planning based on reduce, reuse, recycle and recover using artificial intelligence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, p.106492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106492.
75- Zhang, B., Yang, C., Zhu, H., Li, Y. and Gui, W., 2016. Evaluation strategy for the control of the copper removal process based on oxidation–reduction potential. Chemical Engineering Journal, 284, pp.294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.094.
76- Zhang, R., Chen, Z.Y., Xu, L.J. and Ou, C.Q., 2019. Meteorological drought forecasting based on a statistical model with machine learning techniques in Shaanxi province, China.
Science of the Total Environment,
665, pp.338-346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.431https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.431.
77- Zhang, R., Chen, Z.Y., Xu, L.J. and Ou, C.Q., 2019. Meteorological drought forecasting based on a statistical model with machine learning techniques in Shaanxi province, China.
Science of the Total Environment,
665, pp.338-346.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.431.
78- Zhao, G., Pang, B., Xu, Z., Peng, D. and Xu, L., 2019. Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Science of the Total Environment, 659, pp.940-949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.217.
79- Zhou, P., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Z. and Chai, T., 2015. Source mapping and determining of soil contamination by heavy metals using statistical analysis, artificial neural network, and adaptive genetic algorithm. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(4), pp.2569-2579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.08.003
80- Zhou, Q., Jiang, H., Wang, J. and Zhou, J., 2014. A hybrid model for PM2. 5 forecasting based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and a general regression neural network.
Science of the Total Environment,
496, pp.264-274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.051https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.051.
81- Zhou, Y., Chang, F.J., Chang, L.C., Kao, I.F., Wang, Y.S. and Kang, C.C., 2019. Multi-output support vector machine for regional multi-step-ahead PM2. 5 forecasting. Science of the Total Environment, 651, pp.230-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.111
82- Zhu, S., Han, H., Guo, M. and Qiao, J., 2017. A data-derived soft-sensor method for monitoring effluent total phosphorus. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25(12), pp.1791-1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.06.008.
83- Zonouz, P.R., Niaei, A. and Tarjomannejad, A., 2016. Modeling and optimization of toluene oxidation over perovskite-type nanocatalysts using a hybrid artificial neural network-genetic algorithm method.
Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers,
65, pp.276-285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.05.020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.05.020.
84- Chen, L., Chen, Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Osman, A.I., Farghali, M., Hua, J., Al-Fatesh, A., Ihara, I., Rooney, D.W. and Yap, P.S., 2023. Artificial intelligence-based solutions for climate change: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 21(5), pp.2525-2557. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
85- Gautam, K., Sharma, P., Dwivedi, S., Singh, A., Gaur, V.K., Varjani, S., Srivastava, J.K., Pandey, A., Chang, J.S. and Ngo, H.H., 2023. A review on control and abatement of soil pollution by heavy metals: Emphasis on artificial intelligence in recovery of contaminated soil. Environmental Research, 225, p.115592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115592.
86- Kafi, F., Yousefi, E., Ehteram, M. and Ashrafi, K., 2024. Monitoring Air Pollution Using Sentinel-5 Satellite Imagery: A Case Study of Razavi and South Khorasan Provinces. Sustainable Earth Trends, 4(4), pp.41-55. Doi: 10.48308/set.2024.236905.1067.
87- Shuford, J., 2024. Interdisciplinary perspectives: fusing artificial intelligence with environmental science for sustainable solutions.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) ISSN: 3006-4023,
1(1), pp.106-123. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v1i1.87.
