Calibration and assessment of AquaCrop Model for Managing the quantity and time of applying wheat deficit irrigation

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Ph.D. Candidate, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor,Irrigation and Drainage Dept., Soil and Water Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran


When water resources are limited, the type of plant, growth stage and soil type should be considered for optimal water consumption. Also, it is necessary to calculate the reliable values ​​of soil moisture content, moisture stress and yield function in order to apply deficit irrigation. Management of water consumption in agricultural sector, regardless of water, soil and plant relationships, requires time and cost. Therefore, models of water, soil and plant relationships have been developed due to the limitations of these experiments regarding farm conditions, the short duration of the experiment and the limited number of scenarios examined in the experiment. Optimal irrigation planning is one of the main factors in promoting water productivity and yield. Models such as the AquaCrop which simulate the effects of water levels on yield are useful tools for on-farm water use optimization.
Alizadeh et al. (2010), with irrigation on wheat in Karaj on five treatments with 100, 80, 60, 40 and 20% water requirement as well as a single-irrigation treatment and evaluation of the Aquacrop model for these treatments, concluded that the model was efficient for predicting the amount of seed yield, plant evapotranspiration and water use for 7-day irrigation intervals. The model was, however, less efficient for 14-day irrigation intervals.
Babazadeh and Saraei Tabrizi (2012) in their research on soybean plant in Karaj showed that this model had a good performance in simulating product yield, evapotranspiration and water productivity, and that it could simulate the amount of evapotranspiration with an error of less than 4%.
Although some studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the model in simulating the effects of irrigation on different products since the development of Version 4 of the Aquacrop model, there have been no comprehensive studies on how the model reacts to water stress in different growth stages. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to calibrate and evaluate the Aquacrop model in simulating the response of wheat under deficit irrigation conditions in different periods of plant growth in Shahrekord climate by comparing the results of field experiments to verify its accuracy in predicting different parameters such as grain yield and total dry matter in wheat.


Main Subjects

1-    Araya, A., Habtu, S., Hadgu, K.M., Kebede, A. and Dejene, T., 2010. Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agricultural Water Management, 97(11), pp.1838-1846.
2-       Alizadeh H.A., Nazari, B., Parsinezhad, M., Ramazani Etedali, H. and Janbaz, H. R. 2010. Evaluation of Aquacrop Model on Wheat deficit irrigation in Karaj area, Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 4(2), pp. 273-283. (In Persian).
3-    Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M.E., Barati, M.A. and Rahnama, A., 2011. Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agricultural Water Management, 100(1), pp.1-8.
4-    Iqbal, M.A., Shen, Y., Stricevic, R., Pei, H., Sun, H., Amiri, E., Penas, A. and del Rio, S., 2014. Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation. Agricultural Water Management, 135, pp.61-72.
5-       Babazadeh, H., and Saraei tabrizi, M. 2012. Assessment of AquaCrop Model under Soybean Deficit Irrigation Management Conditions, Journal of Water and Soil, 26(2), pp. 329-339. (In Persian).
6-    Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C. & Fereres, E. 2011. Aquacrop- Reference Manual. Available at:
7-    Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H., 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper, 33, p.257.
8-       Ebrahimi Pak, N.A. 2012. Determination of Wheat Yield Response Factor to Deficit Irrigation at Different Growth Stages, Journal of Crop Production and Processing (JCPP), 2(5). pp. 121-130.‏(In Persian)
9-      Geerts, S., Raes, D.,  Garcia, M.,  Miranda, R.,  Cusicanqui, J. A.,  Taboada, C.,  Mendoza, J.,  Huanca, R., Mamani, A.,  Condori, O.,  Mamani, J., Morales, B., Osco, V. and Steduto, P. 2009. Simulating yield response of Quinoa to water availability with AquaCrop. Agronomy Journal. 101(3), pp. 499-508.
10-   Ghorbanian Kourd Abadi, M., Liaghat, A., Vatankhah, E., Noory, H. 2015. Simulation of yield and evapotranpiration of forage maize using AquaCrop model, Journal of Soil and Water Resources Conservation, 4(2), pp. 47-64.
11-  Heng, L. K., Hsiao, T., Evett, S., Howell, T. and  Steduto, P. 2009. Validating the FAO AquaCrop Model for Irrigated and Water Deficient field Maize. Agronomy Journal, 101(3), pp. 488-498.
12-   Heydarinia, M., Naseri, A.A., and Nasab S.B. 2012. Investigation of Aquacrop Model application in irrigation planning of Sunflower in Ahvaz. Water Engineerig, 5(12), pp. 37-50. (In Persian).
13-  Hsiao, T.C., Heng, L.K.  Steduto, P., Raes, D. and Fereres, E. 2009. AquaCrop-Model parameterization and testing for maize. Agronomy Journal, 101, pp. 448–459.
14-  Jin X-l., Feng, H-k.,  Zhu, X-k.,   Li, Z-h.,  Song, S-n.,  Song, X-y.,  et al. 2014. Assessment of the AquaCrop Model for Use in Simulation of Irrigated Winter Wheat Canopy Cover, Biomass, and Grain Yield in the North China Plain. PLoS ONE, 9(1), pp. e86938. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086938
15- Montoya, F., Camargo, D., Ortega, J.F., Córcoles, J.I. and Domínguez, A., 2016. Evaluation of Aquacrop model for a potato crop under different irrigation conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 164, pp.267-280.
16-  Rinaldy, M., Losavio, N. and Flagella, Z. 2003. Evaluation of OILCROP-SUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agricultural Systems, 78, pp. 17-30.
17-   Salemi, h., Mohd Soom, M., Shui Lee, T., Mousavi, F., Ganjiand, A., and Kamil Yusoff, M. 2011. Application of AquaCrop model in deficit irrigation management of Winter wheat in arid region. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10), pp. 2204-2215.
18-   Sam-Amoah, L. K., Darko, R. O. and Owusu-Sekyere, J. D. 2013. Calibration and validation ofAquacrop for full and deficit irrigation of hot pepper. Journal of Agricultural & Biological Science; 8(2), pp. 175-178.
19-  Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C.  and Fereres, E. 2007. On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity. Irrigation Science, 25, pp. 189-207.
20-   Tavakoli, A. R., A. Liaghat, and Alizadeh, A. 2014. Soil Water Balance, Sowing Date and Wheat Yield Using AquaCrop Model under Rainfed and Limited Irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 14(4), pp.41-56.‏ (In Persian).
21-  Todrovic, M., R., Albrizio, L.,   Zivotic, M. T.,   Abi Saab, C., Stockle and Steduto, P. 2009. Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst and WOFOST model in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes, Agronomy Journal, 101(3), pp. 509-521.
22- Toumi, J., Er-Raki, S., Ezzahar, J., Khabba, S., Jarlan, L. and Chehbouni, A., 2016. Performance assessment of AquaCrop model for estimating evapotranspiration, soil water content and grain yield of winter wheat in Tensift Al Haouz (Morocco): Application to irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management, 163, pp.219-235.
23-  Willmott, C.J. 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63(11), pp.1309-1313.
24-   Zarea Fizabadi, A., and Ghodsi, M. 2002. Study on Drought Tolerance of bread Wheat cultivares in cold regions of Iran. Agricultural sciences and technology, 16(2), pp. 181-189. (In Persian).
Volume 41, Issue 1
May 2018
Pages 31-44
  • Receive Date: 20 July 2016
  • Revise Date: 15 October 2016
  • Accept Date: 16 October 2016
  • Publish Date: 21 April 2018