The Effect of Humic Acid and Phosphorus Fertilizer on Dry Matter and Water Use Efficiency of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum)

Document Type : Research Paper


1 PhD Student, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Associate professor of Soil Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran

3 Professor of Soil Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Associate professor of Soil Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

5 Assistant professor of chemistry, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.


Sugarcane cultivation has been revived in Khuzestan province of Iran since the 1960s and  due to good results, gradually began to grow from north to south of this region. Currently, sugarcane is cultivated in more than 100,000 hectares of the province's land and almost 25% of the country’s demand for sugar is produced in this region. Regarding the very low rainfall and water resources reduction of the country in recent years, the optimal use of irrigation water is very important. Sugarcane fields in Iran due to irrigation problems such as distribution and consumption management, and the lack of continuous and uniform water supply, have high water use per hectare. In other words, the irrigation water use of farms is twice to three times of the real water need of sugarcane. Irrigation water use efficiency or WUE, which can be calculated from the ratio of plant dry matter to water consumption per hectare (Anyia and Herzog, 2004), is a very important criterion that can be of use in evaluating and improving irrigation operations and optimal water consumption. The water use efficiency of sugarcane depends on various factors such as climate, soil characteristics, irrigation management, cane cultivar and plant growth stage.
     Irrigation water quality, climate change, weeds and soil characteristics (high pH and low organic matter, for example) are the main factors that affect production of sugarcane in Iran. Therefore, the yield of the sugarcane is also far from the potential yield. Sugarcane fields of Khuzestan province are mainly rich in lime percentage and poor in organic matter and phosphorus. Soil pH in this region of the country is also about 8-8.5 and uptake of some elements such as phosphorus, by plants and phosphorus fertilizer efficiency in these soils (alkaline and calcareous soils) are expected to be low (Wang and Wang, 1995). The optimum use of phosphorus fertilizer and water irrigation are essential for the quantitative and qualitative function of sugarcane plants. Due to the very low mobility of phosphorus in soil, its uptake by plants such as sugarcane is affected by the number of soil and plant factors (especially plant root characteristics). Changes in these factors can lead to reduction or increase of P uptake by the crop.
Because of the role of organic compounds in improvement of mobility and phosphorus uptake, the use of organic maters has been considered in several researches. Organic compounds can play a direct and indirect role in plant factors and in phosphorous uptake improvement, yield increase and finally water use efficiency improvement.


Main Subjects

1-  Abbasi, F. and Sheiny Dashtegol, A., 2014. Evaluation of farrow irrigation systems in sugar cane agro-industries (Case study in Amir Kabir, Dehkhoda, Farabi and Karun Agro-Industries) Research Report, pp. 16-20 (In Persian).
2- Abd- All, A.E., Ashraf, E., E-Namas. and EL-Naggar, E.M., 2017. Effect of humic acid and foliar application of different potassium sources on yield, quality and water use efficiency of sweet potato grown under drip irrigation in sandy soil. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 38(3), pp. 543-553.
3- Anyia, A.O. and Herzog, H., 2004. Water-use efficiency, leaf area and leaf gas exchange of cowpeas under mid-season drought. European Journal of Agronomy, 20, pp. 327-339.
4- Bezerra, P.S.S., Prado, R.M. and Shigaki, F., 2015. Natural phosphate and humic substances applied in Quartzipsamment and Kandiudult cultivated with Sugar Cane. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 4(2), pp. 153-163.
5- Bouyoucos, G.J., 1961. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54, pp. 464–465.
6- Bruna, A., Marcos, R., Amin, S., Alan, E.R., Fernando, D.A. and Paulo, S.P., 2016. Biological and morphological traits of sugarcane roots in relation to phosphorus uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 16(4), pp. 901-915.
7- Busato, J.G., Zandonadi, D.B., Dobbss, L.B., Façanha, A.R. and Canellas, L.P., 2010. Humic substances isolated from residues of sugar cane industry as root growth promoter.         Scientia Agricola, 67(2), pp. 206-212.
8- Canellas, L.P. and Olivares, F.L., 2014. Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1:3.
9- Demattê, J.A.M., Silva, M.L.S., Rocha, G.C., Carvalho, L.A., Formaggio, A.R. and Firme, L.P., 2005. Variações espectrais em solos submetidos à aplicação de torta de filtro. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 29, pp. 317-326.
10- Govindasmy, R. and Chandrasekaran, S., 2008. Effect of humic acids on the growth, yield and nutrient content of sugarcane. Science of the Total Environment, 117-118, pp. 575-581.
11- Jangpromma, N., Thammasirirak, S., Jaisil, P. and Patcharin, S., 2012. Effects of drought and recovery from drought stress on above ground and root growth, and water use efficiency in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(8), pp. 1298-1304.
12- Kang, Li., Shan-chao, Y.U.E. and Shi-qing, L.I., 2014. Effects of phosphorus application in different soil layers on root growth, yield, and water-use efficiency of winter wheat grown under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Integrative AgricultureVolume, 13(9), pp. 2028-2039.
13- Loeppert, H.L. and Suarez, D.L., 1996. Carbonate and gypsum. Methods of Soil Analysis. SSSA, Part III. Madison, WI, pp. 437-474.
14- Martinez, M.T., Romero, C. and Gaviu, N.J., 1984. Solubilization of phosphorus by humic acids from lignite. Soil Science, 138, pp. 257-261.
15- Miller, R.O., 1998. Determination of dry matter content of plant tissue: gravimetric moisture. Handbook of Methods for Plant Analysis. CRC Press.
16- Nelson, D.W. and Sommers, L.E., 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III. SSSA. Madison, WI, pp. 961-1010.
17- Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, E.S. and Dean, L.A., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture Circular, 939, pp. 1-18.
18- Pizzeghello, D., Francioso, O., Ertani, A., Muscolo, A. and Nardi, S., 2013. Isopentenyladenosine and cytokinin-like activity of different humic substances. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 129, pp. 70-75.
19- Puglisi, E., Fragoulis, G., Del Re, A.A., Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Gigliotti, G., Said-Pullicino, D., Trevisan, M., 2008. Carbon deposition in soil rhizosphere following amendments with compost and its soluble fractions, as evaluated by combined soil–plant rhizobox and reporter gene systems. Chemosphere, 73, pp.1292–1299.
20- Puglisi, E., Fragoulis, G., Ricciuti, P., Cappa, F., Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Trevisan, M. and Crecchio, C., 2009.  Effects of a humic acid and its size-fractions on the bacterial community of soil rhizosphere under maize (Zea mays L.). Chemosphere, 77, pp. 829–837.
21- Sellamuthu, K.M. and Govindaswamy, M., 2003. Effect of fertiliser and humic acid on rhizosphere microorganisms and soil enzymes at an early stage of sugarcane growth. Agronomy Series, No.9, Ed., C.A. Black. Madison, Wisconsin, pp, 1149-1178.
22- Šmejkalová, D. and Piccolo, A., 2008. Aggregation and disaggregation of humic supramolecular assemblies by NMR diffusion ordered spectroscopy (DOSY-NMR). Environmental Science & Technology, 42, pp. 699–706.
23- Sund, K. and Clements, H., 1974. Production of sugarcane under saline desert conditions in Iran. University of Hawai
24- Tennant, D., 1975. A test of a modified line intercepts method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology, 63, pp. 995-1001.
25- Vahap Katka, A., Çelik, H., Murat, A.T. and Asik, B.B., 2009. Effects of soil and foliar applications of humic substances on dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of wheat under calcareous soil conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), pp. 1266-1273.
26- Vaezi, A.R., Homaee, M. and Malakoti., M.J., 2002. Effect of fertigationon fertilizer use efficiency and water use efficiency on forage corn. Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, 158(2)(In Persian).
27- Vafabakhsh, J., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A. and Azizi, M., 2009. Effects of water deficit on water use efficiency and yield of Canola cultivars (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7(1), pp. 280-292. (In Persian).
28- Wang, X.J., Wang, Z.Q. and Li, S.G., 1995. The effect of humic acids on the availability of phosphorus fertilizers in alkaline soils. Soil Use and Management, 11, pp. 99-102.
29- Zandonadi, D.B., Santos, M.P., Dobbss, L.B., Olivares, F.L., Canellas, L.P., Binzel, M.L., Okorokova-Facanha, A.L., Facanha, A.R., 2010. Nitric oxide mediates humic acids-induced root development and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activation. Planta, 231, pp. 1025–1036.
Volume 43, Issue 3
October 2020
Pages 163-177
  • Receive Date: 11 April 2019
  • Revise Date: 05 June 2019
  • Accept Date: 10 June 2019
  • Publish Date: 22 September 2020