Effects of Using Agricultural Drainage Water on Chemical, Biological, and Physical Properties of Soil and Yield of Tomato in Moghan Plain, Iran

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Water Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

2 Soil Science and Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

3 Horticulture science Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

4 Water Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

This study assesses the use of drainage water in agriculture by mixing irrigation water and agricultural drainage water to examine the effects of the mixture on soil properties and the yield of tomatoes in Moghan Plain, Iran. The experimental design was completely random, conducted with three irrigation treatments and four replications for two years. The treatments were the control treatment (only irrigation water) (T0), 50% drainage water +50% irrigation water treatment (T1), and only agricultural drainage water treatment (T2). The results showed the treatments had significant differences (p≤0.05) in terms of the microbial population, basal respiration, and substrate-induced respiration. There were also significant differences among the treatments in terms of soil pH and EC (p≤0.01). However, the soil organic matter, yield, bulk density, and chlorophyll content of tomatoes showed no significant differences among the treatments. The treatments did not differ significantly in terms of the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) in the first year, whereas the Ks for the drainage water treatment differed significantly (p≤0.05) in the second year. No significant differences were observed in the parameters of van Genuchten (θs, θr, and α) among the treatments. Whereas the statistical results showed that there was a significant difference (p≤0.01) in the parameters of van Genuchten (n) between T0 with T1 and T2 treatments, there was no significant difference between T1 and T2 treatments. It can be concluded that the use of drainage water negatively affected soil pH, salinity, and biological properties; but it did not decrease the plant yield.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Aghajani Shahrivar, A., Hagare, D., Maheshwari, B. and Muhitur Rahman, M., 2020. The effect of irrigation using recycled waters obtained from MBR and IDAL wastewater treatment systems on soil pH and EC under kikuyu grass (Pennisetum clandestinum) production. Water Supply, 20(4), pp.1313-1320. Doi: 10.2166/ws.2020.049.

 

  • Al-Isawi, R.H.K., Scholz, M., Al-Faraj, F.A.M. 2016. Assessment of diesel-contaminated domestic wastewater treatedby constructed wetlands for irrigation of chillies grown in a greenhouse. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23: 25003-25023.

 

  • Anderson, T.H. and Domsch, A.K., 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil biology and biochemistry, 25(3), pp.393-395. Doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90140-7.
  • Bagarello, V., Iovino, M., Palazzolo, E., Panno, M. and Reynolds, W.D., 2006. Field and laboratory approaches for determining sodicity effects on saturated soil hydraulic conductivity. Geoderma, 130(1-2), pp.1-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.004.

 

  • Barnes, J., 2014. Mixing waters: The reuse of agricultural drainage water in Egypt. Geoforum, 57, pp.181-191. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.019.

 

  • Beltrán, J.M., 1999. Irrigation with saline water: benefits and environmental impact. Agricultural water management, 40(2-3), pp.183-194.

 

  • Cetin, M. and Kirda, C., 2003. Spatial and temporal changes of soil salinity in a cotton field irrigated with low-quality water. Journal of Hydrology, 272(1-4), pp.238-249. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00268-8.

 

  • Choudhary, O.P., Ghuman, B.S., Josan, A.S. and Bajwa, M.S., 2006. Effect of alternating irrigation with sodic and non-sodic waters on soil properties and sunflower yield. Agricultural water management, 85(1-2), pp.151-156. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.017.

 

 

  • El-Zawily, A.E.S., Meleha, M., El-Sawy, M., El-Attar, E.H., Bayoumi, Y. and Alshaal, T., 2019. Application of magnetic field improves growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato irrigated alternatively by fresh and agricultural drainage water. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 181, pp.248-254. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.018.

 

  • Fereidoni, M.J., Faraji, H. and Owliaie, H., 2013. Effect of treated urban sewage and nitrogen on yield and grain quality of sweet corn and some soil characteristics in Yasouj region. Water and Soil Science, 23(3), pp.43-56.

 

  • Gatta, G., Libutti, A., Gagliardi, A., Beneduce, L., Brusetti, L., Borruso, L., Disciglio, G. and Tarantino, E., 2015. Treated agro-industrial wastewater irrigation of tomato crop: Effects on qualitative/quantitative characteristics of production and microbiological properties of the soil. Agricultural Water Management, 149, pp.33-43. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.016.

 

  • Ghazavi, R. and Orst, M. (2017). Investigation the Effect of Irrigation with Municipal Waste Water on Accumulation of Some Pollutants and Chemicals Elements in Plant and Its Effect on their Ecological Characteristics (A Case Study: Eucalyptus Globulus). PEC2016; 4 (8):13-29. URL: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-169-en.html

 

  • Gupta PK. 2009. Soil, Plant, Water, and Fertilizer Analysis. Agrobios, India.

 

  • Hasheminia M, Koochaki A, Ghahreman N. 1997. Use of Saline Water in Sustainable Agriculture. Mashhad ACECR Publications (In Persian).

 

  • Jones Jr, J.B., 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC.

 

  • Karimi, B., Abdi, C.H. and Fathi Tileko, Z., 1970. Effects of Irrigation with Treated Urban Wastewater on Yield and Some Growth Characteristics of Tomato and Corn in Greenhouse Condition. Water and Soil Science, 28(4), pp.19-29. (In Persian).

 

  • Kiremit, M.S. and Arslan, H., 2016. Effects of irrigation water salinity on drainage water salinity, evapotranspiration and other leek (Allium porrum L.) plant parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, pp.211-217. Doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.02.001.

 

  • Liang, Y., Si, J., Nikolic, M., Peng, Y., Chen, W. and Jiang, Y., 2005. Organic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization. Soil Biology and biochemistry, 37(6), pp.1185-1195. Doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.017.

 

  • Mclean EO. 1983. Soil pH and lime requirement. P. 199- In A.L Page, R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin. Doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c12

 

  • Mojalali H. 1987. Chemistry of the Soil. Tehran University Publishing (In Persian).

 

  • Nasiri N, Rasoulzadeh A. 2011. Evaluating the Effects of Reusing Drainage on the Chemical Properties of Soil (A Case Study: Moghan Plain). The First National Congress of Novel Agricultural Sciences and Technologies; Zanjan University; September 10-12 (In Persian).

 

  • Neishabouri M, Reyhani Tabar A. 2010. Interpretation of the Soil Test Results. Tabriz University Publications (In Persian).

 

  • Norton-Brandao, D., Scherrenberg, S.M. and van Lier, J.B., 2013. Reclamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes–a review of treatment technologies. Journal of Environmental Management, 122, pp.85-98. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.012.

 

  • Abu-Rizaiza, O.S. and Sarikaya, H.Z., 1994. Drainage water reuse or disposal, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Desalination, 98(1-3), pp.173-183.

 

  • Seshadri, B., Bolan, N., Naidu, R. and Matheyarasu, R., 2016. Assessment of nitrogen losses through nitrous oxide from abattoir wastewater-irrigated soils. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 23(22).22633-22646.

 

  • Rasoulzadeh A, Nasiri N. 2013. Investigation of Saline Drainage Water Reuse Effect on Soil HydraulicProperties Using Inverse Method (Case Study: Moghan Plain). Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 43(3):29-40 (In Persian).

 

  • Rasoulzadeh, A. and Yaghoubi, A., 2014. Inverse modeling approach for determining soil hydraulic properties as affected by application of cattle manure. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 7(2), pp.27-35.

 

  • Rasoulzadeh, A., 2010. Evaluation of water retention functions by developing a code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8(2), pp.1180-1184.

 

  • Reinhart, B.D., Frankenberger, J.R., Hay, C.H. and Helmers, M.J., 2019. Simulated water quality and irrigation benefits from drainage water recycling at two tile-drained sites in the US Midwest. Agricultural Water Management, 223, p.105699.Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105699.

 

  • Schinner, F., Öhlinger, R., Kandeler, E. and Margesin, R. eds., 2012. Methods in soil biology. Springer Science & business media.

 

  • Sharma, B.R. and Minhas, P.S., 2005. Strategies for managing saline/alkali waters for sustainable agricultural production in South Asia. Agricultural water management, 78(1-2), pp.136-151. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.019

 

  • Sharma, D.P. and Rao, K.V.G.K., 1998. Strategy for long term use of saline drainage water for irrigation in semi-arid regions. Soil and Tillage Research, 48(4), pp.287-295.

 

  • Singh, S., Raju, N.J. and RamaKrishna, C., 2017. Assessment of the effect of landfill leachate irrigation of different doses on wheat plant growth and harvest index: A laboratory simulation study. Environmental nanotechnology, monitoring & management, 8, pp.150-156. Doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2017.07.005.

 

  • Smaoui, Y., Chaari, L., Fersi, M., Gargouri, K. and Bouzid, J., 2020. Effects of raw and treated landfill leachate on the chemical properties of a Tunisian soil. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 5, pp.1-10.

 

  • Suyama, H., Benes, S.E., Robinson, P.H., Grattan, S.R., Grieve, C.M. and Getachew, G., 2007. Forage yield and quality under irrigation with saline-sodic drainage water: Greenhouse evaluation. Agricultural Water Management, 88(1-3), pp.159-172. Doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.10.011.

 

  • Thomas, G.W., 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis: part 3 chemical methods, 5, pp.475-490. Doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16.

 

  • Tsigoida, A. and Argyrokastritis, I., 2020. Electrical conductivity, pH and other soil chemical parameters after sub-irrigation with untreated and treated municipal wastewater in two different soils. Glob Nest J, 22, pp.55-66. Doi: 10.30955/gnj.003217.

 

  • Van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil science society of America journal, 44(5), pp.892-898. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
Irrigation Sciences and Engineering
Volume 46, Issue 4
January 2024
Pages 13-27

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 27 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 29 July 2023
  • Publish Date: 22 December 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics