Modification of DRASTIC Model with Two Different Methods for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Ardabil Plain

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Assistant Professor. Department of Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Associate Professor. Department of Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

3 Former Graduate Student, MSc Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

چکیده

In the Ardabil Plain, groundwater is one of the most important sources of water supply. Therefore, quality protection and groundwater management are a research priority. Ardabil Plain is in danger due to agricultural activity's excessive consumption of fertilizers in the agricultural sector, livestock, and industrial centers effluent. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and monitor areas with high vulnerability potential. In this study, the vulnerability of the plain is first assessed using the DRASTIC method.  The DRASTIC model is a general method and should calibrate in each area. So, this method was modified by two approaches. In the first approach, sensitivity analysis, and in the second approach, the amount of groundwater supply estimated by the WTF method was used. Then the vulnerability of Ardabil Plain was assessed. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the DRASTIC model in the Ardabil Plain area is susceptible to the parameters of Impact of vadose zone (I), Depth of groundwater (D), and aquifer media (A). The results also showed that the conventional model of the DRASTIC did not produce acceptable results compared to the Nitrate map. But calculating the amount of water recharge (R) by the WTF method, the correlation between the vulnerability maps and the Nitrate map was about 75%. In the second method, soil parameters (S) and hydraulic conductivity (C) did not have an acceptable correlation with the nitrate concentration in the groundwater of Ardabil Plain.  These parameters were removed from the initial equation of the DRASTIC method, and the maps were prepared with the remaining parameters and with new weights and ratings, as a result of which the correlation between the new maps and the nitrate map reached about 30%. According to the WTF modified method for the DRASTIC model, the whole of the Ardabil Plain vulnerability maps in four areas was divided, including medium, high, very high, and infinitely highly vulnerable areas, and 25.8, 47.7, 15.1, and 11.4 percent, respectively.  

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Modification of DRASTIC Model with Two Different Methods for Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Ardabil Plain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Javanshir Azizi Mobaser 1
  • Ali Rasoulzade 2
  • Armin Abedi 3
1 Assistant Professor. Department of Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Associate Professor. Department of Water Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3 Former Graduate Student, MSc Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In the Ardabil Plain, groundwater is one of the most important sources of water supply. Therefore, quality protection and groundwater management are a research priority. Ardabil Plain is in danger due to agricultural activity's excessive consumption of fertilizers in the agricultural sector, livestock, and industrial centers effluent. Therefore, it is necessary to identify and monitor areas with high vulnerability potential. In this study, the vulnerability of the plain is first assessed using the DRASTIC method.  The DRASTIC model is a general method and should calibrate in each area. So, this method was modified by two approaches. In the first approach, sensitivity analysis, and in the second approach, the amount of groundwater supply estimated by the WTF method was used. Then the vulnerability of Ardabil Plain was assessed. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that the DRASTIC model in the Ardabil Plain area is susceptible to the parameters of Impact of vadose zone (I), Depth of groundwater (D), and aquifer media (A). The results also showed that the conventional model of the DRASTIC did not produce acceptable results compared to the Nitrate map. But calculating the amount of water recharge (R) by the WTF method, the correlation between the vulnerability maps and the Nitrate map was about 75%. In the second method, soil parameters (S) and hydraulic conductivity (C) did not have an acceptable correlation with the nitrate concentration in the groundwater of Ardabil Plain.  These parameters were removed from the initial equation of the DRASTIC method, and the maps were prepared with the remaining parameters and with new weights and ratings, as a result of which the correlation between the new maps and the nitrate map reached about 30%. According to the WTF modified method for the DRASTIC model, the whole of the Ardabil Plain vulnerability maps in four areas was divided, including medium, high, very high, and infinitely highly vulnerable areas, and 25.8, 47.7, 15.1, and 11.4 percent, respectively.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Modified drastic
  • Sensitivity analysis
  • WTF
  • Groundwater
  • Abdullah, T.O., Ali, S.S., Al-Ansari, N.A. and Knutsson, S., 2018. Possibility of Groundwater Pollution in Halabja Saidsadiq Hydrogeological Basin, Iraq Using Modified DRASTIC Model Based on AHP and Tritium Isotopes. Geosciences, 8(7), p.236.
  • Allouche N, Maanan M, Gontara M, Rollo N, Jamal I, Bouri S (2017) A global risk approach to assessing groundwater vulnerability. Environmental Modelling and Software 88:168-182

 

  • Besien T (2002) Groundwater vulnerability interactions of chemical and site properties. Journal of the science of the total environment 299:131-143

 

  • Beynen PE,  Niedzielski  MA,  Bialkowska-Jelinska  E, Alsharif K, Matusick J (2012) Comparative study of specific groundwater vulnerability of a karsts aquifer in  central    Journal of Applied Geography 32:868-877

 

  • Chen, S.K., Jang, C.S. and Peng, Y.H., 2013. Developing a probability-based model of aquifer vulnerability in an agricultural region. Journal of hydrology, 486, pp.494-504.

 

  • Fritch, T.G., McKnight, C.L., Yelderman Jr, J.C. and Arnold, J.G., 2000. An aquifer vulnerability assessment of the Paluxy aquifer, central Texas, USA, using GIS and a modified DRASTIC approach. Environmental management, 25(3), pp.337-345.

 

  • Ghafari, H., Rasoulzadeh, A., Raoof, M., Esmeali, A. (2018). 'Estimation of Natural Groundwater Recharge using WTF Method (Case Study: Ardabil Plain Aquifer)', Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 48.1(90), pp. 43-52. (In Persian)

 

  • Huan, H., Wang, J. and Teng, Y., 2012. Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: a case study in Jilin City of northeast China. Science of the total environment, 440, pp.14-23.

 

  • Kazakis, N. and Voudouris, K.S., 2015. Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment of porous aquifers to nitrate: modifying the DRASTIC method using quantitative parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 525, pp.13-25.

 

  • Kendal MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. 4th edh, Griffin, London

 

  • Li, X., Gao, Y., Qian, H. and Wu, H., 2017. Groundwater vulnerability and contamination risk assessment of the Weining Plain, using a modified DRASTIC model and quantized pollution loading method. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(21), p.469.

 

  • Massoud Lak M, Azizi Mobaser J, Rasoulzadeh A., 2019. Evaluation of Intrinsic Vulnerability of Urmia Plain Groundwater Pollution Using Original DRASTIC and DRASTIC Modified Models, Iranian Water Resources Research, 14 (5), pp. 220-235.

 

  • Mimi, Z.A., Mahmoud, N. and Madi, M.A., 2012. Modified DRASTIC assessment for intrinsic vulnerability mapping of karst aquifers: a case study. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(2), pp.447-456.

 

  • Mogaji, K.A. and San Lim, H., 2017. Development of a GIS-based catastrophe theory model (modified DRASTIC model) for groundwater vulnerability assessment. Earth Science Informatics, 10(3), pp.339-356.

 

  • Moustafa, M., 2019. Assessing perched aquifer vulnerability using modified DRASTIC: a case study of colliery waste in north-east England (UK). Hydrogeology Journal, 27(5), pp.1837-1850.
  • Neshat, A., Pradhan, B., Pirasteh, S. and Shafri, H.Z.M., 2014. Estimating groundwater vulnerability to pollution using a modified DRASTIC model in the Kerman agricultural area, Iran. Environmental earth sciences, 71(7), pp.3119-3131.

 

  • Noori, R., Ghahremanzadeh, H., Kløve, B., Adamowski, J.F. and Baghvand, A., 2019. Modified-DRASTIC, modified-SINTACS and SI methods for groundwater vulnerability assessment in the southern Tehran aquifer. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 54(1), pp.89-100.

 

  • Pahlevani Majdabady, M., Rasoulzadeh, A., Kanooni, A. and Ahmadzadeh, G., 2020. Estimation of groundwater recharge originating from agricultural irrigation and rainfall in Shyramyn plain, Iran. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(1), pp.107-120.

 

  • Pacheco, F.A. and Fernandes, L.F.S., 2013. The multivariate statistical structure of DRASTIC model. Journal of Hydrology, 476, pp.442-459.

 

  • Panagopoulos GP, Antonakos AK, Lambrakis NJ (2006) Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS. Journal of Hydrology 14:894-911

 

  • Sadat-Noori, M. and Ebrahimi, K., 2016. Groundwater vulnerability assessment in agricultural areas using a modified DRASTIC model. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 188(1), p.19.

 

  • Sener, E. and Davraz, A., 2013. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability based on a modified DRASTIC model, GIS and an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method: the case of Egirdir Lake basin (Isparta, Turkey). Hydrogeology Journal, 21(3), pp.701-714.

 

  • Srivastav, S.A.S., Kumar, G.S. and Chakrapani, J., 2015. A modified-DRASTIC model (DRASTICA) for assessment of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in an urbanized environment in Lucknow, India. Environ. Earth Sci., 74, pp.5475-5490.

 

  • Vosoogh, A., Baghvand, A., Karbassi, A. and Nasrabadi, T., 2017. Landfill site selection using pollution potential zoning of aquifers by modified DRASTIC method: case study in Northeast Iran. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 41(2), pp.229-239.

 

  • Wang, J., He, J. and Chen, H., 2012. Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China. Science of the total environment, 432, pp.216-226

 

  • Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biomet Bull 1:80-83

 

  • Wu, H., Chen, J. and Qian, H., 2016. A modified DRASTIC model for assessing contamination risk of groundwater in the northern suburb of Yinchuan, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(6), p.483.

 

  • Wu, W., Yin, S., Liu, H. and Chen, H., 2014. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and feasibility mapping under reclaimed water irrigation by a modified DRASTIC model. Water resources management, 28(5), pp.1219-1234.

 

  • Xiaoyu, W.U., Bin, L.I. and Chuanming, M.A., 2018. Assessment of groundwater vulnerability by applying the modified DRASTIC model in Beihai City, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(13), pp.12713-12727.