تبیین موانع نهادی سازگاری سیستم منابع آب با تغییر اقلیم در حوضه قرنقو

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه توسعه اقتصادی و برنامه‌ریزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز

2 دانش‌آموخته دکتری اقتصاد ، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه تبریز.

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر به‌منظور شناسایی و تحلیل موانع نهادی سازگاری سیستم منابع آب حوضه قرنقو با تغییر اقلیم انجام شده است. به این منظور ابتدا سازمان‌های دولتی مرتبط با مدیریت منابع آب این حوضه شناسایی و با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند بازیگرانی که در مورد برنامههای سازگاری با تغییر اقلیم و یا سازگاری با کمآبی دارای مسئولیت و یا تخصص بودند انتخاب و 22 مصاحبه در زمستان 1400 انجام شد. با تجزیه‌وتحلیل و کدگذاری متن مصاحبه‌ها، موانع نهادی سازگاری با تغییر اقلیم شناسایی گردید که مهم‌ترین آن­ها عبارت‌اند از: نبود جامعیت قوانین و مقررات، نبود شرایط تحقیق و توسعه، نبود تولید اطلاعات، نبود دسترسی آزاد به اطلاعات، نبود تخصصگرایی، نبود پاسخگویی، نبود مشارکت همه بازیگران کلیدی، تمرکزگرایی و ضعف در ظرفیت یادگیری. در ادامه به‌منظور بررسی روابط پویای بین موانع از رویکرد پویایی سیستم کیفی و نمودارهای علّی بهره گرفته شد. با ترسیم نمودارهای علّی و تبیین حلقههای بازخوردی بین موانع نهادی سازگاری، به‌منظور ارائه پیشنهادها و اقدامات سیاستی، پنج الگو شناسایی شد. در نهایت اقدامات مداخلهای ارائه شده در قالب چارچوب سطوح مداخله (ILF) مورد بررسی و تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Clarifying the institutional barriers to adapting the water resources system to climate change in the Qarrango Basin

نویسندگان [English]

  • Davood Behbudi 1
  • Fahmideh Ghorbani 2
1 Professor in Economics, Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran (
2 Ph.D. in Economics, Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

In recent years, climate change has always been one of the most critical issues and concerns worldwide. The challenges posed by extreme climate-related events in the field of natural resources, including water resources, are many, especially since water resources issues interact with a wide range of environmental, socio-economic, and political sectors. In addition, the main characteristic of climate change is significant and potentially increasing uncertainty and can increase the complexity of decision-making processes in adaptation planning (Toimil et al., 2020). The main goal of adaptation policies is to reduce the vulnerability of human and natural systems to changing climate regimes (Ghorbani et al., 2022). High adaptive capacity requires action at local, national, and international scales and awareness of dominant social, political, and economic power structures that stand in the way of such inclusive governance (Christoplos et al., 2001). Therefore, the institutional structure is the most critical factor determining the capacity of adaptation, which can appear as a barrier to adaptation actions or can act as an incentive and facilitator of these actions. Barriers are known as one of the reasons for low adaptability capacity (Eisenack & Stecker, 2012; Ekstrom et al., 2010) or as a reason for not converting adaptive capacity into action (Adger, 2009). Barriers are factors that reduce the effectiveness and impact of adaptation actions. They may result in missed lost opportunities or cause higher costs. Humans can overcome, avoid, and reduce them through coordinated action, creative management, changing of practices and mindsets, political will, and re-prioritization of resources, as well as through institutions. Several studies have been conducted in the field of identifying barriers or influential factors in creating the capacity to adapt to climate change (Adger et al., 2009; Goulden et al., 2009; West et al., 2009; Burch, 2010; Ford et al., 2010;  Biesbroek et al., 2011; Runhaar et al., 2012). The purpose of this article is to identify the institutional barriers to the water resources system of the Qarangu Basin in adapting to climate change.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Adaptive Capacity
  • Qualitative System Dynamic Approach
  • Casual Loop Diagram
  • Intervention Levels Framework
  • Abbaszadeh, , Layeghhaghighi, M., Azimi, R. and Hadi, N., 2020. Improving water use efficiency through drought stress and using salicylic acid for proper production of Rosmarinus officinal is L. Industrial Crops & Products, 144, 111893. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111893. (In Persian).

 

  • Abdollahzadeh, G., Azhdarpour, A. and Sharifzadeh, M.S., 2018. Investigating Rural People Perceptions of Climate Changes and Adaptation Strategies in Zabol County. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 28(4), pp. 85-106. DOI: 22108/GEP.2018.103703.1041. (In Persian).

 

  • Adger, WN., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, DR., Naess, LO., Wolf, J. and Wreford, A., 2009. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?. Climate Change, 93, pp.335–354.

 

  • Australian Public Service Commission., 2007. Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra Australian Public Service Commission.

 

  • Azizi Khalkhili, T., Zamani, G. and Karami, E., 2015. Adaptation of agriculture to the fluctuations of climate change, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 3, pp. 148-159. (In Persian).

 

  • Barr, R., Fankhauser, S. and Hamilton, K., 2010. The Allocation of Adaptation Funding, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Centre for climate change economics and policy Grantham research institute on climate change and the environment, Policy paper.

 

7-    Biesbroek, R., Klostermann, J., Termeer, C.J.A.M. and Kabat, P., 2011. Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Climate /law, 2(2), pp.181-199.

 

8-    Biesbroek, R., Termeer, C.J.A.M., Klostermann, J. and Kabat, P., 2013. Analytical lenses on barriers in the governance of climate change adaptation, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 19(7), pp. 1-22.

 

  • Brooks, N., Adger, N.W. and Mick Kelly, P., 2005. The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation, Global Environmental Change, 15, pp.151-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006.

 

  • Burch S., 2010. In pursuit of resilient. Low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities, Energy Policy, 38, pp. 7575–7585. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070.

 

  • Burton I., 2009. Climate change and the adaptation deficit. Earth scan Reader on Adaptation to Climate Change, eds Schipper ELF, Burton I (Earthscan, Sterling, VA), pp. 89–95.

 

  • Christoplos, Lan., Anderson, Simon., Arnold, Margaret., Galaz, Victor., Hedger, Merylyn., Klein, Richard J.T. and Le Goulven, Katell., 2009. The human dimension of climate adaptation (the importance of local and institutional issues, Commission on climate change and development and Stockholm Environment Institute.

 

  • Christoplos, Lan., Farrington, J., Kidd, A., and Beckman, M., (2001). Extension, Poverty, and Vulnerability in Nicaragua Country study for the Neuchatel initiative, Collegium for development studies Uppsala University, Working Paper.

 

  • Delavar, Majid., (2022). The requirements of the optimal approach in climate change adaptation policies in the water and agriculture sector, Islamic Parliament Research Center, Water Group Social Studies Office, Report 25018399. (In Persian).

 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell., 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Introduction, Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, editors, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

 

  • Durham, J., Schubert, L., Vaughan, L. and Willis, CD., 2018. Using systems thinking and the Intervention Level Framework to analyze public health planning for complex problems: Otitis Media in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children. PLoS ONE, 13(3): e0194275.

 

  • Eaken, H., and Luers, Amy Lynd., 2009. Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental System, Annual Review of Environmental and Resources, 31(1), pp.365-394. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352.

 

  • Eisenack, K., and Stecker, R. A., 2012. Framework for analyzing climate change adaptations as actions, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17, pp. 243–260.

 

  • Ekstrom, J. A., and Moser S. C., 2014. Identifying and overcoming barriers in urban climate change adaptation: Case study findings from the San Francisco Bay Area. California, USA, Urban Climate, 9, pp.54-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.06.002..

 

  • Ekstrom, JA., Moser, SC., and Torn, M., 2010. Barriers to Adaptation: A Diagnostic Framework. Final Project Report (California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA).

 

  • Fankhauser, S. and McDermott, Thomas K.J., 2014. Understanding the adaptation deficit: Why are poor countries more vulnerable to climate events than rich countries? Global Environmental Change, 27, pp. 9-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.014.

 

  • Farzaneh, Mohammadreza., Bagheri, Ali. and Momeni, Farshad., 2016. Analysis of the institutional base of the underground water resources system in the Rafsanjan area by system dynamics approach, Iran water resources research, 12(2), pp. 67-82. (In Persian).

 

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, King M. and Fugal C., (2010). Vulnerability of aboriginal health systems in Canada to climate change, Global Environmental Change, 20, pp. 668–680. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.05.003.

 

  • Ghorbani, Fahmideh., Behboudi, Davood. and Zarghami, Mahdi., 2022a. Participatory Water Resources Management Strategy: Institutional Analysis and Collective Action Approach (Sahand Dam Downstream), Journal of Water and Irrigation Management, 12(1), pp.121-137. (In Persian).

 

  • Ghorbani, Fahmideh., Behboudi, Davood. and Zarghami, Mahdi., 2022b. Identification and thematic analysis of barriers to adaptation to climate change (Case study: Qarranqu basin), Iran-Water Resources Research, 18(3). (In Persian).

 

  • Golfam, Parvin. and Ashofteh, Parisa-Sadat., 2018. Development of gray approach in water resource management using risk indicators. Iran- Water Resources Research, 15(3), pp.120-132. DOR: 1001.1.17352347.1398.15.3.9.0. (In Persian).

 

  • Goulden, M., Conway, D. and Persechino, A (2009), Adaptation to climate change in international river basins in Africa: a review, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54, pp. 805–828. DOI: 10.1623/hysj.54.5.805.

 

  • Heydari, Asadollah. and Moghimi, Ebrahim., 2017. Geomorphology and systemic management of the river (case study: Qarranqu Basin to Sahand Dam (Hashtrod)). Geography journal. 5(14), pp.119-137. (In Persian).

 

  • Jafari Azad, Amir., Mirzaei, Khalil. and Seyfollah, Seyfollahi., (2022). Social consequences of water transfer projects with an emphasis on the concept of citizenship, Social Research Journal, 14(4), pp. 15-42. (In Persian).

 

  • Jahantigh, Hossein., Bakhshi, Amir. and Ghorbani. S, Rezvan., 2022. Barriers and requirements for adaptation of farmers in mountainous areas to climate change, a case study: Papi section of Khorram Abad city. Applied Research of Geographical Sciences journal, 22(67), pp. 281-300. DOI: 10.52547/jgs.22.67.281. (In Persian).

 

  • Jahantigh, M., Samadi, K., Esmaeelzadeh Dizaj, R. and Salari, Saeed., 2020. Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from lesions of colibacillosis in broiler chickens in Sistan, Iran, BMC Veterinary Research, 267(16), pp.1-6. (In Persian).

 

  • Johnston, LM., Matteson, CL. and Finegood, DT., 2014. Systems science and obesity policy: a novel framework for analyzing and rethinking population-level planning. Am J Public Health;104(7), pp.1270–1278.

 

  • Kaufmann, D., 2010. The Worldwide Governance Indicators Methodology and Analytical Issues. Policy Research Working Paper WPS 5430. The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team.

 

  • Mahmoudi, H., Renn, O., Vanclay, F., Hoffmann, V. and Karami, E., 2013. Framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, pp. 43:1-8.

 

  • Malhi, L., Karanfil, O. and Merth, T., 2009. Places to intervene to make complex food systems healthier, green, fair, and affordable. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 4(3–4), pp. 466–476. DOI: 10.1080/19320240903346448.

 

  • Meadows, D. and Wright, D., 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.

 

  • Mirnezami, S.Jalaleddin. and Bagheri, Ali., 2017. Evaluation of the water governance system in the process of protecting Iran's underground water resources, Iran -Water Resources Research, 13(2), pp.32-55. (In Persian).

 

  • Mohammadi, Parvin. and Malekian, Arash., 2020. Evaluation and Analyses of Adaptation Capacity of Local Communities to Climate Hazards (Study Area: Sefidbarg and Bivandsofla Villages, Javanroud County), Environmental Hazards Management, 7(1), pp. 39-54 DOI: 10.22059/JHSCI.2020.299401.549. (In Persian).

 

  • Mohammadi, Parviz., Malekian, Arash., Ghorbani, Mahdi. and Nazari. S Aliakbar., 2019. Investigating the Relationship between the Vulnerability of Communities and Climate Changes in Kermanshah Province, Geography and Sustainability of Environment, 32, pp. 33-47. DOI: 22126/GES.2019.3873.1994. (In Persian).

 

  • Nobles, James D., Radley, Duncan. and Mytton, Oliver T., 2021. The Action scales model: A conceptual tool to identify key points for action within complex adaptive systems, Perspectives in Public Health, ISSN 1757-9139, DOI: 10.1177/175791392110067.

 

  • Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

 

  • Panditharatne, Chandani., 2016. Institutional barriers in adapting to climate change: A case study in Sri Lanka, Ocean and Coastal Management, 130, pp. 73-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.06.003.

 

  • Parry, ML., Canziani, OF., Palutikof, JP., van der Linden, PJ. And Hanson, CE., 2007. Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.

 

  • Rogers, P. and Hall, A.W., 2003. Effective water governance, Stockholm: Global water partnership, 7.

 

  • Runhaar, Hens., Mees, Heleen., Wardekker, Sluijs., Jereen, Van der., and Driessen, Peter P. J., 2012, Adaptation to climate change- related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers, Regional Environmental Change, 12, pp.777-790.

 

  • Senge PM., 1990. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

 

  • Sterman, J. D., 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World, Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

 

  • The Spatial Planning document of East Azerbaijan province., 2021. Management and Planning Organization. (In Persian).

 

  • Tol, Richard S.J. and Yole, Gray W., 2007. The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: An empirical test, Global Environmental Change, 17, pp. 218-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.08.001.

 

  • UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme., 2012. The United Nations World Water development report 4: managing water under uncertainty and risk, executive summary, 24p.

 

  • West, DW., Kujbida, GW., Moore, DR., Atherton, P., Burd, NA., Padzik, JP., De Lisio, M., Tang, JE., Parise, G., Rennie, MJ., Baker, SK. and Phillips, SM., 2009. Resistance exercise-induced increases in putative anabolic hormones do not enhance muscle protein synthesis or intracellular signaling in young men. J Physiol, 21(1), pp.5239-5247.

 

 

  • Zea-Reyes, Leonardo., Olivotto, Veronica. and Bergh, L. Sylvia., 2021. Understanding institutional barriers in the climate change adaptation planning process of the city of Beirut: Vicious cycles and opportunities, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 26, pp.1-24.